| Start date: | 01.01.2003 |
| End date: | 31.12.2005 |
| Funded by: | Cusanus-Werk |
Involving features of the daily ‘Großwetterlagen’ (Central Europe)
and the Spatial Synoptic Classification (USA), respectively, a specification
of meteorological extremes and synoptic regularities can be achieved.
Unusual dryness is considered as an extreme, too, by labeling sequences
of dry days or days with very light precipitation as a dry period. From
the extensive sample of extremes information will be condensed by using
multivariate methods aiming at a classification of heavy precipitation
fields and flood events in terms of frequency, intensity and duration.
Methods applied include regression, discrimination and Principal Component
Analyses. Results can be validated with the help of gridded reanalysis
data (NCEP/ NCAR) for precipitation rate, convective precipitation, and
surface runoff. Water equivalent of snow cover and soil moisture data
are available as controlling parameters.
In a next step, instead of large-scale circulation patterns characteristics
and frequencies of frontal and convective conditions above the affected
regions themselves will be regarded as sources of precipitation and discharge
variability. Several cited methods are applied as well as own numerical
approaches. Analyses aim at the detection of frontal and convective classes
on a daily scale for several tropospheric levels. More sophisticated approaches
of classification include meteorological variables like geopotential height,
specific humidity, wind direction and wind speed, potential temperature,
dew point temperature, and cloud cover. A time series of frontal and convective
events independent from precipitation predictors is to be generated. Results
are based on spatial gradients – vertical and horizontal ones -, on interdiurnal
fluctuations, and on layer thicknesses. Threshold values fitted to the
specific problem need to be derived in order to define the existence of
a front or of distinct convection, threshold values with regard to an
intensity gradation must be fixed.
Finally, the question is raised whether or not and how far a correlation
matrix of frontal and convective classes on the one hand and of precipitation
plus flooding extremes on the other hand implies reasonable indications
of causal relationships. After optimising such a matrix, if necessary,
it serves as a basis to draw, in a reverse methodical approach, conclusions
from atmospheric GCM (ECHAM4) data to hydrological extremes on regional
to local scales. In addition, particular attention will be put on seasonal
and spatial changes, both within the individual regions and in comparison
between the two regions.
![]() |
Discharge stations Central Europa |
![]() |
Discharge stations USA |
![]() |
Precipitation stations Central Europe |
![]() |
Precipitation stations USA |